<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nature, Science and World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnrusson.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnrusson.com/?p=940</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:23:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton</title>
		<link>http://johnrusson.com/?p=940#comment-964</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnrusson.com/?p=940#comment-964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a distinction, though, to be made between the pure and applied sciences. 

Applied sciences, yes, are often the hijacking of pure scientific method by self-serving concerns for material or political gain. Something similar might be said of philosophy. Nietzsche&#039;s work, for example, was hijacked and manipulated by the Nazis to rationalize the questionable ethics of their sociopolitical agenda. Where the pursuit of knowledge is changing, is largely in the advancement of our capacity to apply it and with that advancement, comes the danger of that application becoming increasingly misguided. 

Science will help to produce a fantastic military aircraft. Pay no mind, though, to the man behind the curtain, the questionable ethics of its intended application. Focus instead on what a terrific machine your tax dollars can produce.

The answers to this would seem to be mindfulness and vigilance. This is where the apparent decline in proportional support of study in humanities becomes dangerously unfortunate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a distinction, though, to be made between the pure and applied sciences. </p>
<p>Applied sciences, yes, are often the hijacking of pure scientific method by self-serving concerns for material or political gain. Something similar might be said of philosophy. Nietzsche&#8217;s work, for example, was hijacked and manipulated by the Nazis to rationalize the questionable ethics of their sociopolitical agenda. Where the pursuit of knowledge is changing, is largely in the advancement of our capacity to apply it and with that advancement, comes the danger of that application becoming increasingly misguided. </p>
<p>Science will help to produce a fantastic military aircraft. Pay no mind, though, to the man behind the curtain, the questionable ethics of its intended application. Focus instead on what a terrific machine your tax dollars can produce.</p>
<p>The answers to this would seem to be mindfulness and vigilance. This is where the apparent decline in proportional support of study in humanities becomes dangerously unfortunate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whitney</title>
		<link>http://johnrusson.com/?p=940#comment-963</link>
		<dc:creator>Whitney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnrusson.com/?p=940#comment-963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a very interesting post.  I especially like that you discuss how the method of experimental science is expressive of our &quot;meaningful inhabitation of the world,&quot; as you put it.  What came to mind as I was reading this is that modern science&#039;s preference for power and manipulation over truth introduces the further issues of possession and authority as modes of &quot;meaningful inhabitation.&quot;  If I look at something to determine what it can do for me, rather than allowing it to reveal itself, I make a claim on it, and in doing so I also implicitly assert my authority to make this claim.  This is a common and destructive attitude towards natural resources, in part because it demands another claim to authority to counter it, as opposed to actually engaging with the truth (hence the frustratingly hopeless political debates surrounding environmental crises).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting post.  I especially like that you discuss how the method of experimental science is expressive of our &#8220;meaningful inhabitation of the world,&#8221; as you put it.  What came to mind as I was reading this is that modern science&#8217;s preference for power and manipulation over truth introduces the further issues of possession and authority as modes of &#8220;meaningful inhabitation.&#8221;  If I look at something to determine what it can do for me, rather than allowing it to reveal itself, I make a claim on it, and in doing so I also implicitly assert my authority to make this claim.  This is a common and destructive attitude towards natural resources, in part because it demands another claim to authority to counter it, as opposed to actually engaging with the truth (hence the frustratingly hopeless political debates surrounding environmental crises).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
